[EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

The San Andreas Network is an independent network; everything to do with them, including recent articles, about shows, employee biographies and employment, is found inside!
Post Reply
User avatar
Apophis
Game Admin
Game Admin
Posts: 7327
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:28 pm
Ingame name: popposito x dai lo

[EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by Apophis » Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:29 am

ARTICLESEMPLOYMENTREAL ESTATEJOBSVEHICLESWEEKLY CIRCULARSGOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONSPLACE AD
Image


Are PF license regulations unreasonable?
By Enzo Nota | June 31st, 2018.

The Purchase Firearm license, ran by the LSPD, is one of the most sought after applications in the state. Naturally, because of the side effect of you gaining access to firearms from a successful application - the LSPD has attempted to make the application stringent to ensure they are in compliance with local and state standards. But recently activists raise the question - are all their criteria in accordance to state law? Are their expectations unreasonable, and do they endanger anyone?

One of the most controversial provisions of the LSPD's "criteria" (a sort of pseudo-law, something that you must obey or be arrested without being written by any elected official) is a clause in section 2.3 - "Must not remove the firearm from its locked container when transporting the firearm to a property, even if self defense is required". As a para-legal reading this, this does not look enforceable. A reasonable interpretation of this is if your life is being threatened, you can not defend yourself. This is something that the LSPD's firearms licensing division may revoke your license for, but duress protects someone from prosecution.

This is just one of the many potentially problematic provisions in the licensing criteria. Should the LSPD be able to create rules that every citizen who wishes to own a firearm must follow, even if they don't go through the senate or governor? Comment down below what you think of these rules.


Image

Code: Select all

[b]COMMENT by[/b] [Insert Username]
[b]Email:[/b] [Insert E-mail] 
[b]Comment:[/b] [Insert Comment]
apophis x plastic x junipero x dogs x leispang x gwb x kirby x zulu x oliver x retina x limpone x sao x bd x redboy x lunar x loud pack x mrm x m1


User avatar
Cantbehudson
Senior Forum Moderator
Posts: 1550
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:24 pm
Location: Hungary

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by Cantbehudson » Sun Aug 05, 2018 2:14 pm

COMMENT by NutButter
Email: huddybuddy@lsmail.com
Comment: sd should loan their paralegals to pd

midox191
Gangster
Gangster
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 1:53 pm
Ingame name: Jennifer Wells
Location: Inside your closet

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by midox191 » Wed Aug 08, 2018 9:09 am

COMMENT by Jenny191
Email: jenny191@gmail.com
Comment: I think the said rule is just. Otherwise the system would be open to abuse. If one wants to be able to use their firearm outside of their business or property, they should apply for a CCW.

User avatar
chea
Mafia
Mafia
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:34 pm

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by chea » Wed Aug 08, 2018 10:09 am

COMMENT by pigkiller666
Email: pigkiller666@lsmail.com
Comment: ur suggestion is dumb LMAO, clearly you don't know shit for being a terminated cop and being a FLD supervisor, i guess thats y u were terminated LOL :joy:

User avatar
KashØut
DREAMCHASER
DREAMCHASER
Posts: 2720
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 6:56 am
Ingame name: icon livin
Location: kiss land

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by KashØut » Sat Aug 11, 2018 2:13 am

COMMENT by letyanutshang
Email: mystummyhurt@lsmail.com
Comment: yes lemme just get popped in my face and not defend myself with the pf gun i specifically purchased for an incident like this
if it aint XO then it gotta go

User avatar
Iudex.
veritas vos liberabit
veritas vos liberabit
Posts: 3936
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2015 7:15 am

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by Iudex. » Sun Aug 12, 2018 3:55 am

COMMENT by Row
Email: undertunnelworks@gmail.com
Comment: Wow what abuse is this
oàdǐug wo ai

I lay there and watched the God I had created die

User avatar
Charlie Brown
Wannabe Don
Wannabe Don
Posts: 3188
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:38 am

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by Charlie Brown » Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:32 am

COMMENT by Shiimy Aoleriona
Email: shimshim@aol.com
Comment: only cops should have guns

User avatar
knppel
Wannabe Don
Wannabe Don
Posts: 2336
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:20 am
Ingame name: Carry Saunders

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by knppel » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:17 am

COMMENT by CSaundersOfficial
Email: cs@ve.com
Comment: It's a joke - you'd think after the government going down like what four times the past two years they'd finally set the regulations to allow private enterprises to actually protect themselves from all the rifles on the street, but no!
Every ganger has their kalashnikov under the bed and the legal economy fights back with handfirearms, that is the real problem here. Our local gun regulation is a joke- the state fails to control illegal gun shipping and trafficing and thus focuses to bully what they can cover- legal firearm holders who cause barely a danger to anyone, and in most cases have to protect businesses who regularly get attacked with heavy arms.

Post Reply

Return to “San Andreas Network”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users