[EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Moderators: Apophis, San Andreas Network Mods, Lead Admins

Post Reply
User avatar
Apophis
In-Game Lead Administrator
In-Game Lead Administrator
Posts: 10242
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:28 pm
Ingame name: popposito x dai lo

[EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by Apophis » Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:29 am

ARTICLESEMPLOYMENTREAL ESTATEJOBSVEHICLESWEEKLY CIRCULARSGOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONSPLACE AD
Image


Are PF license regulations unreasonable?
By Enzo Nota | June 31st, 2018.

The Purchase Firearm license, ran by the LSPD, is one of the most sought after applications in the state. Naturally, because of the side effect of you gaining access to firearms from a successful application - the LSPD has attempted to make the application stringent to ensure they are in compliance with local and state standards. But recently activists raise the question - are all their criteria in accordance to state law? Are their expectations unreasonable, and do they endanger anyone?

One of the most controversial provisions of the LSPD's "criteria" (a sort of pseudo-law, something that you must obey or be arrested without being written by any elected official) is a clause in section 2.3 - "Must not remove the firearm from its locked container when transporting the firearm to a property, even if self defense is required". As a para-legal reading this, this does not look enforceable. A reasonable interpretation of this is if your life is being threatened, you can not defend yourself. This is something that the LSPD's firearms licensing division may revoke your license for, but duress protects someone from prosecution.

This is just one of the many potentially problematic provisions in the licensing criteria. Should the LSPD be able to create rules that every citizen who wishes to own a firearm must follow, even if they don't go through the senate or governor? Comment down below what you think of these rules.


Image

Code: Select all

[b]COMMENT by[/b] [Insert Username]
[b]Email:[/b] [Insert E-mail] 
[b]Comment:[/b] [Insert Comment]
apophis x plastic x junipero x dogs x leispang x gwb x kirby x zulu x oliver x retina x limpone x sao x bd x redboy x lunar x loud pack x mrm x m1 x taxi x bigs

1-2-3-4-5-6-7-H8 Image

User avatar
Cantbehudson
Wannabe Don
Wannabe Don
Posts: 1590
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:24 pm
Location: Hungary

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by Cantbehudson » Sun Aug 05, 2018 2:14 pm

COMMENT by NutButter
Email: huddybuddy@lsmail.com
Comment: sd should loan their paralegals to pd
Anyone who runs is a VC. Anyone who stands still is a well-disciplined VC!

User avatar
.Angelo.
Protect and Serve
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 1:53 pm
Ingame name: Jeffrey Holt
Location: Inside your closet

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by .Angelo. » Wed Aug 08, 2018 9:09 am

COMMENT by Jenny191
Email: jenny191@gmail.com
Comment: I think the said rule is just. Otherwise the system would be open to abuse. If one wants to be able to use their firearm outside of their business or property, they should apply for a CCW.

User avatar
dom
Protect and Serve
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:34 pm
Ingame name: Derrick_Kwon

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by dom » Wed Aug 08, 2018 10:09 am

COMMENT by pigkiller666
Email: pigkiller666@lsmail.com
Comment: ur suggestion is dumb LMAO, clearly you don't know shit for being a terminated cop and being a FLD supervisor, i guess thats y u were terminated LOL :joy:

User avatar
KashØut
DREAMCHASER
DREAMCHASER
Posts: 3000
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 6:56 am
Location: キッスランド

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by KashØut » Sat Aug 11, 2018 2:13 am

COMMENT by letyanutshang
Email: mystummyhurt@lsmail.com
Comment: yes lemme just get popped in my face and not defend myself with the pf gun i specifically purchased for an incident like this
if it aint XO then it gotta go

User avatar
Iudex
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4816
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2015 7:15 am

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by Iudex » Sun Aug 12, 2018 3:55 am

COMMENT by Row
Email: undertunnelworks@gmail.com
Comment: Wow what abuse is this
Image
He saw them too. They were armored all in snow, it seemed to him, and ribbons of mist swirled back from their shoulders. The visors of their helms were closed, but he did not need to look upon their faces to know them.

User avatar
Charlie Brown
Wannabe Don
Wannabe Don
Posts: 3206
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:38 am

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by Charlie Brown » Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:32 am

COMMENT by Shiimy Aoleriona
Email: shimshim@aol.com
Comment: only cops should have guns

User avatar
knppel
Wannabe Don
Wannabe Don
Posts: 2458
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:20 am
Ingame name: Carry Saunders

Re: [EDITORIAL] Are PF License Regulations Unreasonable?

Post by knppel » Sun Aug 12, 2018 11:17 am

COMMENT by CSaundersOfficial
Email: cs@ve.com
Comment: It's a joke - you'd think after the government going down like what four times the past two years they'd finally set the regulations to allow private enterprises to actually protect themselves from all the rifles on the street, but no!
Every ganger has their kalashnikov under the bed and the legal economy fights back with handfirearms, that is the real problem here. Our local gun regulation is a joke- the state fails to control illegal gun shipping and trafficing and thus focuses to bully what they can cover- legal firearm holders who cause barely a danger to anyone, and in most cases have to protect businesses who regularly get attacked with heavy arms.

Post Reply

Return to “SAN Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users